// you’re reading...

Bioethics

Life Is Not Sacred: Why Killing Someone is Morally Acceptable But Disabling Them Is Immoral

Not my thesis but the argument of two prominent bioethicists in addressing the issue of organ donation:

Is it morally wrong to kill people? Not really, argue two eminent American bioethicists in an early online article in the Journal of Medical Ethics. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, of Duke University, and Franklin G. Miller, of the National Institutes of Health believe that “killing by itself is not morally wrong, although it is still morally wrong to cause total disability”.

Ultimately their aim is to justify organ donation after cardiac death (DCD). This is a state in which a patient is neurologically damaged and cannot function without a respirator. Within minutes of withdrawing this, the organs are removed. However, the authors state frankly that the patient is not dead at that point because it is possible that the patient’s heart could start beating again. (Other bioethicists disagree, vehemently.)

“[T]he criterion of irreversibility has not been satisfied; hence, these patients are not known to be dead at the time of organ procurement.”

In view of well-publicised organ shortages, transplant surgeons are eager to increase the number of available organs. DCD is an important avenue. However, a nagging suspicion that these patients might not be dead is still a substantial stumbling block because the medical profession insists that donors must always be dead. But Sinnott-Armstrong and Miller have an solution:

“[T]he dead donor rule is routinely violated in the contemporary practice of vital organ donation. Consistency with traditional medical ethics would entail that this kind of vital organ donation must cease immediately. This outcome would, however, be extremely harmful and unreasonable from an ethical point of view [because patients who could be saved will die]. Luckily, it is easily obviated by abandoning the norm against killing.”

This radical conclusion may shock some readers, but the authors are not murderers. They want to bring greater precision to what we mean by killing. Rendering someone totally and permanently incapacitated is just as bad as taking a life, or so they contend. Killing totally disabled patients does them no harm.

“Then killing her cannot disrespect her autonomy, because she has no autonomy left. It also cannot be unfair to kill her if it does her no harm.”

Nor, they say, is life “sacred”. The only relevant difference between life and death is the existence of abilities – and a brain-damaged person no longer has these.

“[I]f killing were wrong just because it is causing death or the loss of life, then the same principle would apply with the same strength to pulling weeds out of a garden. If it is not immoral to weed a garden, then life as such cannot really be sacred, and killing as such cannot be morally wrong.”

Discussion

One comment for “Life Is Not Sacred: Why Killing Someone is Morally Acceptable But Disabling Them Is Immoral”

  • Clomo

    I am extremely wary of organ donation, that’s why I won’t be organ donor and I don’t want to be a recipient. Everyone accuses people of being selfish for not wanting donate organs, but it all comes down to, its our life first and we have a right to keep on living until we are too far gone. I want to be the priority if I get in an accident. I’m saying everyone is corrupt, but I know there are bad apples out there and hopefully I don’t get one of those bad apples. Organ donation also kind of creeps me out, I know there are sick people waiting, but what disturbs me is when someone hopes for an organ (not from a live donor) they are hoping for someone that matches to be pronounced brain dead, they hoping that someone’s child, mother/father etc dies. These brain dead people are not people that die naturally of old age, they are victims of a tragic accident and have to die in way where their organs can be used. While one family if grieving another is celebrating about the organ, I would never be able to celebrate under those circumstances, someone lost a loved one. That makes it seem as though the donor isn’t even human, just a used car with spare parts. I have watched documentaries of people receiving organs, I know they have been sick and are relieved, but is it that hard to take 1 minute and grieve for the person who is giving you new life? When I watched organ transplants it also bothered me how excited the doctors were to go take an organ. I can understand you are happy for sick patient, but I think the level of celebrating is absolutely insensitive to the donors family. You are celebrating the death of that person, that is undeniable or else you wouldn’t get the organ.

Recent Tweets From Us

Follow @spindr on twitter.

Tweets From Dean Masserman

Follow @FamilyLawLA on twitter.

Blog Catalog

Law & Legal Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory